Ho,Hum! Just another expected PERFECTLY NATURAL RE-OCCURING CYCLE

by Barry Day
(Scone NSW)

Ho,Hum! Just another expected PERFECTLY NATURAL RE-OCCURING CYCLE

Ho,Hum! Just another expected PERFECTLY NATURAL RE-OCCURING CYCLE

THE GREATEST SCIENTIFIC SCANDAL OF OUR TIME
warwickhughes.com/icecore/zjmar07.pdf


______________________

GOOGLE THE BELOW

References


-------------------------
Is Academic Science for Sale?"

You'd better believe it.

Michael Fumento is a Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington, D.C. where he

specializes in health and safety issues.
_____________________

Japanese IPCC scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh PhD says global warming ?worst scientific scandal?
_____________________

The "Hockeystick",The Global Warming Scandal of the Decade,By Michael R. Fox, Ph.D.
_____________________

The Greatest Scientific Scandal Of Our Time,by Zbigniew Jaworowski, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc.
_____________________

Douglas J. Keenan, a former Morgan Stanley arbitrageur and current independent

mathematical researcher, identified "fabrications" in such studies that suggest a "marked lack

of integrity in some important work on global warming that is relied upon by the IPCC"
____________________

Falsified Temperature Record in China
Behind Al Gore's Climate Fraud (84 Temperature Stations)
____________________

Did Jones et al 1990 "fabricate" its quality control claims?
___________________

What Keenan is also exposing is at least two failing events of the peer review process
___________________

How the Hadley Centre spins the data on non-warming after 2002?

Barry L's Response Yes, we know there is a cyclic nature to climate change. This graph does show it quite well except the annotations a bit difficult to read.

It covers the last 5000 years and uses a tracer called d180, whatever that is. It hits various highlights over the centuries. the Minoan Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, the Midiaeval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age

The webpage at Aridity Index shows a bit more history.

Climate, Cycles, and Critical Thinking


We've got some interesting perspectives now. Some healthy skepticism, some curiosity, and a little Al Gore vs. Common Sense. Let's take a deep breath (hopefully in air that's not toxic).

Cycles of the climate -always have existed, always will. It's just basic climatology. The earth has warmed and cooled long before SUVs, coal plants, and plastic straws. During the Minoan Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Medieval Warm Period, or Little Ice Age, there were no industrial emissions.

Real debate isn't if the climate changes, but why and how humans contribute:
- There's a Maunder Minimum (have you heard of it?)
- There's more to El Nio and La Nia than fishing
- It's possible for an eruption to outweigh years of human pollution
- Svensmark's cloud cover and cosmic ray research is fascinating

Climate discourse ignores these massive natural forces in favor of CO2-centered narratives. You can't blame your neighbor's pickup truck for every hurricane, drought, or heatwave.

It's about Stewardship, not Scare Tactics


There's no argument for burning oil, cutting trees, and dumping plastic in the ocean. It's important to balance environmental responsibility with economic freedom, scientific integrity, and common sense.

The climate is changing. Whether drastic policies do more harm than good depends on how much humans drive them.

Let's talk, not dictate. Be open-minded. You shouldn't believe every doomsday prediction. Here's what history teaches us: It's hard to tell when the world will end. 😏

Feel Free to add your Thoughts Below


Also, Search this site for more information now.

Comments for Ho,Hum! Just another expected PERFECTLY NATURAL RE-OCCURING CYCLE

Average Rating starstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Rating
starstarstar 		facts and fiction
by: connie

Although weather seems to have a cyclic nature to it, things are happening now to our atmosphere and the ozone, which couldn't have been factored into the equation previously. The rising sea level which is affecting some islands and their inhabitants, for example, or the melting glaciers taking away the natural habitat for polar bears for another. I would like to see some data concerning the ozone layer and what we've done to it.

If it's a cycle or if it isn't, the fact is, we need to be more responsible, and quit putting so much toxic garbage into the air-we do have to breathe it, after all, and it couldn't hurt to err on the side of caution.

From Barry - Connie, pollution isn't good. We don't want dirty air. There's a connection between air pollution and climate change, but they're not the same:

There's good news about the ozone layer! CFCs are banned under the Montreal Protocol, closing the ozone hole. Global cooperation works when we focus on real, solvable problems.

It's tricky with sea level rise. How much of the flooding is caused by sinking land, erosion, or local factors? Sea levels have been rising since before factories and freeways.

Polar bears aren't dying out despite being the poster child for climate change. Populations are stable or growing in most regions.

Is that it? Make sure our concerns are based on real data, not doomsday predictions.
Rating
starstarstar 		New Information
by: khushe

I didn't know about this NATURAL RE-OCCURING CYCLE. I think many people must not be knowing about this . SO thanks for the information.

From Barry - Let me introduce you to the natural cycle perspective. Past warm periods aren't mentioned because it undermines the idea that modern warming is entirely our fault.

Using ice cores, tree rings, and historical climate records, you can see what Earth's climate was like before the use of our fuels.
Rating
starstarstarstarstar 		I tend to agree....although...
by: Christine

I generally tend to agree that real evidence and facts have yet to prove that human behavior has a significant impact on global warming. Without real evidence, you're innocent until proven guilty.

With that said, I think that people shouldn't be wasteful of our natural resources just for the heck of it.

But, it'd be great to hear a factual debate between someone who takes Al Gore's position and someone who takes the position that we're just in a natural up-and-down cycle.

From Barry - You got it, Christine. 'Innocent until proven guilty' isn't just good legal policy, it's good science too. The burden of proof should be on those who claim humans are driving climate change.

You're also right that waste is bad stewardship. Litter, pollute, and deplete resources shouldn't be mindless. It's common sense.

A balanced discussion between climate alarmists and skeptics would be great-unfortunately, that rarely happens. Instead of hearing dissenting voices, they're shut down, defunded, or labeled "deniers." That's dogma, not science.
Rating
starstarstar 		This article is mostly opinion base.
by: Theron

My first opinion of this article was that is actually explained the title. I found that is was more opinionated rather than based on facts.
The website it's self is definitely worth browsing through because it raises a lot of interesting questions concerning hazards to the Earth it's self.
I would like to find more facts on relevant subjects and sources of where the information was obtained.

From Barry - There are plenty of opinions here (mine included!). Also, mainstream climate discourse often uses selective data.

More References

Want additional facts and sources? Let's get started:
- MIT climatologist Richard Lindzen.
- Judith Curry - Former IPCC scientist who left because of politics.
- Bjorn Lomborg advocates practical climate policies instead of panic.

You should do your own research. I'm not the only one who knows a bit.

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Picture of Global Warming.


Do you have concerns about air pollution in your area??

Perhaps modelling air pollution will provide the answers to your question.

That is what I do on a full-time basis.  Find out if it is necessary for your project.


Have your Say...

on the StuffintheAir         facebook page

Other topics listed in these guides:

The Stuff-in-the-Air Site Map

And, 

See the newsletter chronicle. 

Thank you to my research and writing assistants, ChatGPT and WordTune, as well as Wombo and others for the images.

GPT-4, OpenAI's large-scale language generation model (and others provided by Google and Meta), helped generate this text.  As soon as draft language is generated, the author reviews, edits, and revises it to their own liking and is responsible for the content.