Check out how rigorous types of data quality checks lead us to providing accurate air quality dispersion modelling.

As professionals, we use a many types of data quality checks to see that air quality dispersion modelling is accurate and to avoid costly mistakes and consequences. Experts manage emissions and predict pollutant impacts by mastering these complex air quality assessments.

Managing emissionsAir quality predictions based on good data.

This page is about checking air quality and assessing air quality impacts through dispersion modelling. This guide, derived primarily from the British Columbia and Alberta Air Quality Modelling Guidelines, outlines the steps and information you'll need to conduct these assessments, including:

  • Information about the facility, contact info, and assessment level.
  • Overview of the project, its purpose, and its setting.
  • The models to be used, any modifications, and why.
  • Planned outputs like concentration maps.
  • Details on emissions sources and characteristics.
  • Pollutant baseline concentrations: How to figure them out.
  • Building downwash effects: Take that into account.
  • Input topography, land use, and surface characteristics.
  • How the model will use meteorological data.
  • Tests and evaluations of inputs and outputs that are part of Data Quality Management.

The Ministry reviews and possibly revises the plan. Level 1, 2, and 3 assessments are also differentiated, with specific requirements for each, such as emission sources, stack dimensions, receptor grid resolution, and quality assurance procedures.

Air Quality Dispersion Modelling in British Columbia

The ideal document outlines a plan for conducting dispersion modelling, which is used to assess air quality impacts. Here's how it's broken down:

  • Details like date, facility name, contact info, and level of assessment.
  • Description and geographic setting: Provides an overview of the project, including its purpose and the surrounding area.
  • The dispersion model(s) to be used, any modifications planned, and the reasoning behind them.
  • Outputs planned for the model: Concentration maps, tables, etc.
  • Details the sources and characteristics of emissions to be modelled, including emissions rates and variability.
  • Describe how baseline concentrations of pollutants will be determined, using monitoring data or other methods.
  • Discuss whether building downwash effects will be taken into account.
  • Topography, land use, and surface characteristics are used as input to the model.
  • The meteorological data input: Describes how the model will use the meteorological data.
  • Different treatments are applied to the model, like converting NO to NO2 and chemical transformations.
  • Data quality management program: Describes how input and output data are tested and evaluated.
  • Review and revisions by the Ministry: Discusses the process of reviewing and possibly revising the plan.
Normal Baseline ConcentrationsQuality data for environmental protection

The document you present would be best if it covers the following these types of data quality checks, everything from initial setup to data quality assurance and review processes for conducting dispersion modeling for air quality assessments.

A Level 1 Assessment would look like this:

  • Describe the emission sources.
  • Please provide stack dimensions, exit parameters, and emission rates.
  • Set the receptor grid resolution and domain size.
  • Include topography, land use, and sensitive receptors in the model.
  • Include the dimensions of the buildings.
  • Describe the screening model, along with assumptions and options.
  • Show maximum predicted contaminant concentrations and corresponding meteorological conditions.
  • Set a baseline for contaminant levels.
  • Include input files and a printout of the screening model.

Level 2 or 3 assessments:

  • Please provide a site plan with the locations and elevations of emission sources and buildings.
  • Include topography, land use, and meteorological data.
  • Make sure you include stack dimensions, exit parameters, and emission rates.
  • Include any pre-processing utilities and assumptions you used.
  • Describe the model, any assumptions, modifications, and settings.
  • Set the size and resolution of the receptor grid.
  • Provide quality assurance procedures for model input and behavior.
  • Include baseline concentrations and isopleth maps for all pollutants modelled.
  • Include scenarios for existing sources, new sources, and cumulative effects.
  • Upon request, provide electronic copies of input and critical output files.

All critical factors-emissions, meteorology, topography, and data quality-are rigorously assessed using this comprehensive approach to air quality dispersion modelling.

Invisible: Predicting Air Quality Impacts in Alberta's Industrial Heartland

The first list of types of data quality checks recommended outlines the information needed for a screening assessment, which quickly estimates air quality impacts. Here's what's in it:

  • Details about the facility, like the address, company name, and regulatory approvals.
  • Pollutant Sources and Emissions: Information about sources that emit pollutants, including their number, type, location, emissions rates, and characteristics.
  • Topography: A description of the terrain, vegetation, and sensitive receptors around the area.
  • Air Quality Modelling Predictions: Summary of predicted impacts on air quality, including ground-level concentrations of pollutants, graphs showing concentration levels, and comparison with existing monitoring data.
  • Review of dispersion model inputs and outputs.

Overall, it's a comprehensive guide to assessing air quality impacts from a facility, including data collection, modelling, and reporting.

Emissions data and pollutionTurbulence and air quality predictions.

We need the following info for refined, advanced, and alternate assessments.  Basic information about the facility:

  • Name, address, and regulatory approvals.
  • Classification of industries.

The sources and emissions evaluated:

  • A table with source locations, types, and emission rates.
  • Details on stack parameters, emissions, and calculation methods.
  • Variations in operation and potential emissions scenarios.
  • Other major sources in the study area.

Climatology and topography:

  • Topography, elevation, vegetation, and sensitive receptors are described.
  • Climate data including temperature, precipitation, and wind patterns.

Hourly meteorology:

  • Data sources and representativeness.
  • Characteristics of wind, temperature, and turbulence.

Setup for air quality modeling:

  • Model version, switches, and default settings.
  • Data and models about air quality.

Predictions for air quality:

  • Building downwash effects and baseline concentrations.
  • Ground level concentrations for different scenarios.
  • An isopleth showing predicted concentrations.
  • Predictions of acid and particulate deposition if applicable.
  • Data comparison with existing monitoring.

Topics of Interest:

  • Uncontrolled releases and unusual natural phenomena pose risks.
  • Chemical transformations, plume reactions, and synergistic effects.
  • Considerations for icing and visibility impacts.

A conclusion:

Air quality impact assessment summary reiterating key findings.

Types of data quality checks in Saskatchewan and Manitoba

SK:

A checklist for the content of a modelling report for air quality analysis is included in this appendix. A new or modified source won't harm ambient air quality, concludes the report. The types of data quality checks are as follows:

Information about the source:

  • Overview of the project, including plant processes and why we're modeling.
  • Details about the location, including a plot plan and an area map.
  • Descriptions, capacities, and calculation methods.
Air quality challenges predicted by advanced modeling.Ensure our Prairie Air remains clean.

The analysis:

  • Models and procedures discussed.
  • Domain size, terrain data, and meteorological data.
  • Flares, odors, and deposition are all assessed.

Documentation of Results:

  • Identify the standards and criteria.
  • Figures and tables showing model results, including impacts from new/modified sources and air quality violations.

Supporting files:

Model inputs and outputs, terrain data, and plot files should be submitted electronically.

MB:
In addition to the results of the air dispersion modelling and any health risk assessment, the report needs to include various types of data quality checks, such as from these Sections: 

  • II MODEL SELECTION, including Background, Screening Model Assessment, and Refined Model Assessment,
  • III PROJECT DESCRIPTION with Project Overview, Facility Description, and Process Description, and
  • IV AIR DISPERSION MODEL INPUTS: Sources, Receptors, Meteorological Data, Land Use Analysis, Topography, Background Ambient Air Quality, and GEP Stack Height Analysis.

Describe the input data, modelling methodology, and results in detail for Manitoba Conservation to verify. You should include maps, diagrams, and tables related to the discussion, including GEP, urban/rural land use analysis, significant terrain, and sensitive receptors.

The report should also discuss ways to comply with licensing requirements if predicted exceedances happen.

We Solve Air Quality Challenges with Expert Dispersion Modeling

You don't want to get bogged down by complicated air quality dispersion models when you're navigating complex environmental regulations. Calvin Consulting Group Ltd. understands the urgency and importance of air quality assessments. With over 95 years of combined experience, we provide businesses across Canada with top-tier dispersion modeling services that ensure compliance and safety.

From setting up the right meteorological data to evaluating every emission source, we customize our approach to your company requirements. To help you meet regulatory standards and prepare for potential risks, our team provides practical and correct solutions. Our team is trusted by top authorities in the field, including Alberta Environment and Environment Canada.

Calvin Consulting provides fast, reliable, and expert assessments. Besides being thorough, our service provision is also flexible to fit your schedule. We'll handle the technical details while you focus on your business. To get started, contact Barry at:

Contact Barry for reliable dispersion modelling results.

Our expert team at Calvin Consulting transforms air quality challenges into manageable solutions.

Clean air is our Passion...Regulatory Compliance is our Business.

New! Comments

Do you like what you see here? Please let us know in the box below.

Getting accurate data is crucial for air quality assessments, and mastering data quality checks is crucial for aif quality dispersion modelling.

How can we implement rigorous quality assurance processes so every modelling step - from pollutant concentration predictions to baseline comparisons - is accurate? From emission source characteristics to meteorological inputs?

So you can meet today's air quality challenges with confidence, I provide some checks ensure your results are robust, compliant with regulations, and ready for review.



Do you have concerns about air pollution in your area??

Perhaps modelling air pollution will provide the answers to your question.

That is what I do on a full-time basis.  Find out if it is necessary for your project.



Have your Say...

on the StuffintheAir         facebook page


Other topics listed in these guides:

The Stuff-in-the-Air Site Map

And, 

See the newsletter chronicle. 


Thank you to my research and writing assistants, ChatGPT and WordTune, as well as Wombo and others for the images.

GPT-4, OpenAI's large-scale language generation model (and others provided by Google and Meta), helped generate this text.  As soon as draft language is generated, the author reviews, edits, and revises it to their own liking and is responsible for the content.