Woo!

by Ace
(Birmingham, Alabama)

It sounds like the person writing the article hasn't actually watched the show. Lots of factual information but little description. The show does a good job of explaining scientific concepts and then applying them, without the show seeming dull or preachy. As with any Disney production, it's fairly good at appealing to a wide variety of ages. I can recall watching episodes of the show in high school, even, and enjoying it. It's great for there to be such a neat show on air getting people -- not just kids, excited about science!

As for Mythbusters, it's got a lot of flair, but they don't always explain the concepts behiind stuff. More explosions and shiny things and a bit less Science. Although I enjoy watching it, it bothers me when they say, after *one* test/experiment, that something has been "completely 100% disproven". That's not science.

Barry's Response - Thanks Ace: I have watched a few Bill Nye episodes with my kids and have enjoyed it quite well. Not MythBusters, though. Not yet. I did not write the article. Bottom line, I can only recommend Bill Nye so far, and that I do.

Search this site for more information now.

Praise and Criticism of MythBusters:

My experts indicate that overall, MythBusters is a great show that explains science to the masses. It should, however, strive for greater scientific rigor and safety while still being unique. First the good...

MythBusters deserves praise for its groundbreaking concept. Test everyday myths, urban legends, and scientific claims in an entertaining, hands-on way. It's both entertaining and educational.

The hosts are engaging and charismatic, especially Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage. They have a great chemistry on screen, so it's fun to watch. They're great at simplifying complex scientific concepts.

MythBusters bring science to life with hands-on experiments. It promotes critical thinking and challenges common beliefs. Science education benefits from this hands-on approach.

Slow-motion shots and special effects add an extra layer of excitement to the show. Adding visual appeal to scientific experiments makes them look amazing.

However we have observed these things:

While MythBusters is entertaining, it sometimes sacrifices scientific rigor for the sake of fun. There are some experiments that lack control and precision, so the results are questionable. Viewers could get misinformed.

Repetition: Over time, MythBusters revisited myths and experiments, sometimes recycling them. Seeing the same thing over and over can get boring, since fresh and original content becomes harder to come by.

Occasionally, the hosts do risky experiments in search of excitement, setting a dangerous example for viewers. Even in the pursuit of entertaining science, safety should be a priority.

It lacks diversity among its hosts, which is a missed opportunity to represent a broader range of perspectives and talents.